Search for: All records

This paper took up the tradition of Critical Feminism and Ethnography to examine early childhood education (ECE) pre-service teachers’ perspectives on STEM and robotics integration. The central research questions are (1) How can we make sense of preservice teachers’ formation of STEM/STEAM teacher identity while participating in our robotic unit from a Critical Feminist perspective? (2) What are preservice teachers’ perceptions of benefits, barriers and concerns (both structural level and individual level), and recommendations for pedagogical practice for STEM and robotics integration in ECE? (3) How can we better prepare and support pre-service teachers, largely women and non-STEM-majors, for STEM and robotics content integration in their classrooms? To answer the above questions, we collected interview data from 76 informants from a large public university in the Southeastern United States. Each informant designed a lesson plan on teaching with robots and completed approximately 30-minute structured interviews. We focused on our informants' lived experiences and centered their voices while conducting and analyzing the interviews via thematic coding and category analysis. Analysis of the interview stories indicated that our informants considered the robotics module in their pre-service training as a valuable learning experience of STEM/robotics integration in ECE. The three most commonly perceived benefits of STEM/robotics integration by pre-service teachers are early exposure helps build a STEM knowledge foundation (n = 66), STEM and robotics content effectively increases students’ motivation and engagement (n = 60), and bridging the gender gap in STEM as historically male-dominated fields (n = 27). The three most commonly perceived barriers are concern about age-appropriateness of robots (n = 53), time/state standard constraints (n = 35), and funding/resources available and support from the school and local district (n = 18). Our findings indicate structural and institutional barriers are still present and can potentially deter ECE teachers from implementing STEM/robotics content in their classrooms. We thus call for attention from a structural level instead of shifting the burdens onto both pre-service and in-service teachers. Employing a conscious effort of being self-reflexive, critical, and counter-hegemonic in our practices, this article is one of the first to approach motivation from a Critical Feminism perspective in the field and provides tangible implications for both engineering education research and practice.